Sure.
You might want to subscribe to [email protected], and browse here once in a while: https://lemmyverse.net/communities
“A prickle of hoglets.”
related: [email protected]
Disappointing that it doesn’t show anything at all without javascript.
I don’t follow Meta services, but for the record, I think you’re talking about the EU Digital Markets Act and its interoperability requirements of gatekeepers.
https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/gatekeepers_en
Long ago, I solved all of the ways in which PHP made me sad…
…by abandoning it.
Nowadays we have better languages that can do the job at least as well.
Breath of the Wild: Beautiful. Mysterious. Inspired.
Tears of the Kingdom. Big. Shallow. Boring.
I found the first dozen or two hours of TotK exciting, as I encountered new mechanics and a darker side of Hyrule. But it wasn’t long before the new and exciting became endless expanses of copy/paste encounters and terrain, forgettable characters, and annoying enemies. Nothing felt clever or interesting. I lost interest in exploring, and wandered away from the game.
Then I went back to the first game for another run.
A good tool improves the way you work. A great tool improves the way you think.
Do these accept cash, or only ATM cards? (The latter would link your transaction to your bank account, of course.)
What do they give? A printout of a wallet address?
SomaFM uses shoutcast/icecast streams, so just about any half-decent media streaming device or software can play it.
You are not alone in feeling it’s overblown.
Well-done ray tracing can be beautiful, but realistically, it doesn’t matter to me. I’m not Narcissus; I don’t play games to stare at my reflection in a puddle. My time and attention are almost entirely devoted to things that move too fast for ray tracing to matter, or reading text, or the geometry of a scene as I plan my approach to whatever I’m about to do.
If all other things were equal, I would gladly take the extra eye candy. But to me, it’s not worth paying significantly more money for real-time ray tracing hardware and higher electricity bills.
Please wake me up in ten years or so, when every GPU does it well without measurably increasing power draw.
What do you mean by “flat”? A circle is by definition two dimensional.
Someone with undetermined/unknowable gender would use the pronouns they/them, never he/him.
We’re not discussing what someone would use for themselves. We are discussing what someone would use when writing about a hypothetical person.
If you believe that he or him would never be used in this case, then I suggest you do some research on the history of language.
Edit to clarify: And by history, I include recent history, meaning usage by people alive today, who learned it in school not terribly long ago.
Either a male person or a hypothetical person whose gender is unknowable.
None of what you claim was done in the document being discussed.
It isn’t a fucking “convention” to push women down
No, but choosing either the male or female pronoun when writing about a hypothetical person has been the convention for a long time, and using the male one has been the usual default for far longer than any of us has been alive. It’s not to push women down; it’s a grammar compromise, and is not exclusive English.
You are misunderstanding the language as it was used, and you have jumped to a false conclusion that seems to make you so angry that you think it’s okay to publicly vilify someone… for your own mistake.
I hope things get better for you.
Good day.
I’m partial to a prickle of porcupines.
More here